Colorado Firecamp - wildfire training wildland firefighter training Wildfire Blog Engine Boss Apprenticeship Location and Facility About Colorado Firecamp Frequently Asked Questions
Colorado Firecamp - wildland firefighter training

Surviving
Fire Entrapments

Introduction

Objectives

Previous Studies of Vehicle Burnovers

Cooperators

Test Procedures and Methods

Test Results

Discussion

References

About the Author

Appendix A - Vehicle Entrapment Study Plan

Appendix B - Characterizing Gases Generated in Vehicles and Fire Shelters

Appendix C - Insulated Boxes for Protecting Video Cameras


Also read about engine entrapment incidents:

 

Surviving
Fire Entrapments
Comparing Conditions Inside
Vehicles and Fire Shelters


Discussion

This project's primary purpose was to gain quantifiable data on conditions in engine cabs and fire shelters under identical, real-life conditions. However, we made a number of qualitative observations that are relevant to survivability in an entrapment. They include:

  • In most fuel types (besides grass and light brush), the temperature and radiant heat flux generally increase with the height above the ground. This is consistent with the principle that heat rises. This observation has special relevance considering the height of an engine cab compared to the height of a fire shelter.
  • Heat from the passage of the fire front appears to be retained in the vehicles longer than in the fire shelter or other items of PPE, indicating that the metal in an engine may act as a "heat sink" (Figure 25).


    Figure 25-Even after a fire has passed, a vehicle retains heat, acting as a "heat sink."

  • When fire comes up a steep sideslope, it appears to go over the top of an engine and under the chassis, creating an eddy on the back side that draws heat and flame (Figure 26). A firefighter taking shelter behind an engine parked on a steep slope would not be protected from heat or flame. This effect was demonstrated in October 1996 when a engine was burned over during the Calabasas Incident in southern California.


Figure 26-When a fire comes up a steep sideslope, it appears to go over and under the engine, creating an eddy on the back side that draws heat and flame.

  • Video footage shows that a large volume of smoke seeps into the engine cab, even when the cab's windows are tightly rolled up. This occurred under low-temperature conditions when the cab might appear to be survivable.
  • When the outside doors of an engine cab are subject to high radiant heat loads, the petroleum-based plastics and sound-deadening materials in the door panels and dashboard volatilize. The smoke generated by this volatilization may cause both short-term and longterm health effects on firefighters without respiratory protection, and will create conditions that force them from the cab into the fire area.
  • During the moderate-intensity, shortduration exposure of the Los Angeles County tests, exterior components of the engines either caught fire or experienced some melting (Figures 27 and 28). Under higher intensity or longer duration exposures, the engine could catch fire and continue burning when conditions outside would be harmful to a firefighter attempting to leave the engine.


Figure 27-Items on an engine's exterior may catch fire during moderate-intensity, short-duration fires.


Figure 28-Items on an engine's exterior may catch fire during moderate-intensity, short-duration fires.

  • For these tests, both the engines and fire shelters were placed in the area most likely to receive the highest exposure to the flaming front and the radiant heat flux. In a real-world fire entrapment, moving just a few feet back from the oncoming flaming front- especially on a road cut on steep slopes- appears to significantly reduce the effect of temperature and radiant heat flux on both the individual firefighter and an engine.
  • Because of safety concerns during testing, the gas tanks on all the engines were empty. In an actual fire operation, damage to the fuel tanks during a burnover could increase the danger to firefighters in or near an engine.
  • Observation of the exposed PPE indicated that under experienced radiant heat loads, the protective characteristics of the clothing and personal protective equipment appear to offer adequate levels of protection (Figure 29) for an entrapped firefighter who has neither a shelter nor an engine for protection.


    Figure 29-Even though the engine is on fire, the shelters and personal protective clothing are undamaged.

  • The temperature difference between the 1-inch (3-cm) and 12-inch (30-cm) levels in the fire shelters reinforces the need to encourage entrapped firefighters to get on the ground and to keep their face and mouth as close to the ground as possible, protecting their respiratory system.
  • Since the test engines were drained of gasoline or diesel fuel, the engine's motors could not be left running during the burnover to assess the effect of reduced oxygen on engine performance. Experience during the recent Calabasas entrapment showed that an engine became "oxygen starved" and quit running in a burnover situation. Firefighters hoping to escape a burnover by driving away in an engine should consider this possibility.
  • Under high heat loads, tempered glass in the cab's windows may break out. This may occur when the difference in temperature inside the cab and the temperature outside is only 4 °C. Consideration should be given to using safety glass for greater levels of protection. In a real fire entrapment or burnover, the human dimension is a critical factor:
  • What is the experience and training of the individuals involved? Does their frame of reference (experience) allow them to recognize the situation they are in, and make the appropriate response?
  • Do the firefighters have knowledge of all the pertinent factors? In the Wenatchee Heights entrapment, Fire Chief Rick West thought he knew the fuel conditions (grass), but was unaware of the woody component from apple orchard trimmings.
  • That fuel resulted in a high-intensity, long-duration flame front that compromised his safety in the cab of the engine. When he was forced to flee the engine, he suffered serious burns over much of his body.
  • How much time is available for the critical decision? Can you get all the exposed firefighters into an engine cab safely in less than the 20 to 25 seconds needed to deploy a fire shelter?
  • Have firefighters considered the need for an adequate Safety Zone early on during the fire suppression, or do they consider their engine or fire shelter to be their "Survival Zone?"

<<< continue reading—Surviving Fire Entrapments, References >>>

 


©2005 Colorado Firecamp, Inc. home scheduleblogENGBfacilityabout usFAQ's